-----
To: ateneo_college1972@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 12:23 PM
Subject: Re: [ateneo_college1972] Re: Fwd: Letter from Fr. Tito Caluag
To: ateneo_college1972@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2012 12:23 PM
Subject: Re: [ateneo_college1972] Re: Fwd: Letter from Fr. Tito Caluag
Hi Frankie,
You have the gift of capturing the very heart of my thoughts, and I guess of a lot of people. Animo!
Maning
To: AteneoHS68@yahoogroups.com; Ateneo_college1972 <ateneo_college1972@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tue, September 25, 2012 8:26:06 AM
Subject: [ateneo_college1972] Re: Fwd: Letter from Fr. Tito Caluag
Folks,
I have read the many comments and, frankly, I think you all are being too kind to MVP:
1. Yes, MVP, "it is time to call it a day". Here I agree with him 110 %. Sorry to say, but MVP has not imbibed the true "Ateneo Way". By his actions, he has proven to himself and to others that he is not an Atenean at heart. A Bedan friend texted me this morning to ask "Is it true that MVP is now 100% Bedan"? My answer was " He was, is, and will forever be. He just had a short fling with the Ateneo".
2. I agree with Fr. Caluag that MVP has not properly ingested and digested the Saint Ignatius' Prayer for Generosity "To give and not to count the cost..." The priest last Sunday mass, in his sermon (yes, I listen sometimes), said that " service without humility is arrogance. CORRECT. MVP has become supremely arrogant and his hubris is getting in the way.
3. If I were to talk to MVP - I would ask him - Is your gift giving quid pro quo? Your money as quid for Ateneo's agreeement to your policies as quo?
4. Yes, MVP has, in the past, been kind to the Ateneo in terms of donations for Buildings and, no doubt, for its sports development. But, do not tell me that his ego did not receive anything in return....The Ateneo has always stood with the Catholic Church on the RH Bill. Their stand on Mining has been longstanding. Why is MVP only "parting ways" now because of irreconcileable differences ? The differences have been irreconcileable for a long time . Is it because the Ateneo is no longer useful to him because it is generally seen that next year will be a tough year for the basketball team? I hate to be petty - but it certainly could be true, knowing the ego of this guy.
5. As I have written before, I do not agree with Ateneo's stand on the RH Bill. In fact, my sentiments are more in line with the 199 professors who expressed support for the RH Bill. I have read the Jesuit "Talking Points" on Mining . I find nothing wrong with it. For me, if this will be the Jesuit stand, then it is fine. It fact , it states that it would question some of the provisions of the Pnoy Mining Executive Order. Nothing wrong with that. The reasoning is sound.
The point I am trying to make is that we may agree or disagree with the Jesuits on their stand on various issues. But, hey, this is a free country. They can give their opinion and I will respect them as I am sure they will respect mine - and just as they have respected the opinion of the 199 professors. I will not anchor my support for the school on the contingency of parallel belief of various causes. But I guess there is a big difference between my situation and MVP. He has given many millions of Pesos to the school and I guess he feels that the school ought to stand with him even if the stand of the Jesuits or the school are diametrically opposed to his.
6. But, he also brought up the issue of "plagiarism" himself . That was a no-no, MVP, especially since it was done in a commencement exercise. The Jesuits were right in not wanting you to be President of the Board of Trustees. What message would it have brought to the students if you had stayed? I was not shy at that time in telling the Alumni Association that, in fact, MVP was wrong. Whatever can be said about his past generosity, that he had underlings who wrote the plagiarized speech etc etc, at the end, the buck stops at your desk. MVP is rich enough to hire a trusted speechwriter or at least a quality control guy. NO EXCUSES. Get out of our way. You are not a true Atenean.
7. Fr. Caluag is correct. What happened was for the good, especially for the Ateneo. Time to fend for ourselves. Time, really, to call it a day. MVP could have been more classy in the "separation". But as they say " you can take the guy out of the barrio, but you cannot take the barrio out of the guy."
So, goodbye, good riddance, back to work and back to the routine..
Cheers.
--- On Tue, 9/25/12, Paulino Reyes <paulinoreyes@gmail.com> wrote:
|
__._,_.___
.
__,_._,___
No comments:
Post a Comment